Graph of the Week – Higher-than-expected US rents put Fed patience in focus

US core inflation came in hotter than expected in January, rising by 0.4% month-on-month versus the more modest 0.3% gain many had expected. While deflation continued in core goods prices – down by 0.3% MoM – services price inflation rose by a strong 0.6% with an unusually large divergence in the rental property price indices.  

Actual tenants’ rents rose by 0.4%, but owners’ equivalent rent (or OER, which estimates the equivalent rent a property owner would pay) advanced by 0.6% (see exhibit 1), for the biggest gap between the two measures since the mid-1990s. Because OER and rent are such large components of the overall core consumer price index, accounting for over 40% of it, even such small differences matter for core CPI as a whole.

Had OER risen by the same amount as rent in January (which is the normal situation), overall core inflation would have been almost 7bp lower at 0.32% MoM instead of 0.39%. The difference between the two accounts for much of the higher-than-expected gain in core CPI.

The hotter than expected CPI data sent a flutter through markets counting on the US Federal Reserve to start a series of interest rate cuts this spring. We believe the Fed will take its time and not lower rates until it is comfortable that inflation is under control and on track for its 2% target. The Fed has pencilled in three rate cuts for this year, but not committed to a timeline.

Disclaimer

Important information

Please note that articles may contain technical language. For this reason, they may not be suitable for readers without professional investment experience. Any views expressed here are those of the author as of the date of publication, are based on available information, and are subject to change without notice. Individual portfolio management teams may hold different views and may take different investment decisions for different clients. This document does not constitute investment advice. The value of investments and the income they generate may go down as well as up and it is possible that investors will not recover their initial outlay. Past performance is no guarantee for future returns. Investing in emerging markets, or specialised or restricted sectors is likely to be subject to a higher-than-average volatility due to a high degree of concentration, greater uncertainty because less information is available, there is less liquidity or due to greater sensitivity to changes in market conditions (social, political and economic conditions). Some emerging markets offer less security than the majority of international developed markets. For this reason, services for portfolio transactions, liquidation and conservation on behalf of funds invested in emerging markets may carry greater risk.

Environmental, social and governance (ESG) investment risk: The lack of common or harmonised definitions and labels integrating ESG and sustainability criteria at EU level may result in different approaches by managers when setting ESG objectives. This also means that it may be difficult to compare strategies integrating ESG and sustainability criteria to the extent that the selection and weightings applied to select investments may be based on metrics that may share the same name but have different underlying meanings. In evaluating a security based on the ESG and sustainability criteria, the Investment Manager may also use data sources provided by external ESG research providers. Given the evolving nature of ESG, these data sources may for the time being be incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable. Applying responsible business conduct standards in the investment process may lead to the exclusion of securities of certain issuers. Consequently,  performance may at times be better or worse than the performance of relatable strategies that do not apply such standards.

Back to Top