BNP AM

El inversor sostenible para un mundo en evolución

Ideas de inversión | Podcast - 10:39 MIN

Talking Heads – Carteras multiactivos: ¿posicionamiento de defensa o de ataque?

Daniel Morris
2 Autores - Ideas de inversión
22/05/2023 · 5 Min

Las señales que nos indican el momento del ciclo económico en el que nos encontramos no están particularmente claras, ya que la economía mundial está saliendo de un escenario sin precedentes en el que se han combinado una pandemia mundial y unas medidas masivas de estímulo fiscal y expansión cuantitativa. ¿Qué activos podrían obtener buenos resultados en un entorno como el actual?

En esta nueva edición del podcast Talking Heads, Mark Richards, director de las carteras de rentabilidad absoluta y flexible del equipo de multiactivos y soluciones cuantitativas (MAQS), y Daniel Morris, estratega jefe de mercado, analizan las cuestiones que hay que tener en cuenta a la hora de posicionar las carteras multiactivos.

También puedes escuchas el podcast y suscribirte a Talking heads en YouTube o en tu canal favorito.

XXX BNP AM

Leer la transcripción

This is an edited transcript of the audio recording of this Talking heads podcast

Daniel Morris:

Hello, and welcome to the BNP Paribas Asset Management Talking Heads podcast. Every week, Talking Heads will bring you in-depth insights and analysis through the lens of sustainability on the topics that really matter to investors. In this episode, we’ll be discussing positioning multi-asset portfolios. I’m Daniel Morris, Chief Market Strategist, and I’m joined by Mark Richards, Head of Multi Asset Flexible and Absolute Return.

Welcome, Mark, and thanks for joining me.

Mark Richards: Hi, Dan, it’s a pleasure.

DM: So, Mark, if we look at the economy and the markets, one of the main current themes is the anticipation of a recession. There are indicators in the market that it’s coming but it never seems to arrive. Part of the confusion may be that growth, certainly in Europe, has been better than expected. On the other hand, growth in China has disappointed. All this is happening as the central banks raise interest rates to slow growth, so the big question is whether that leads to a recession. The market seems to be pricing the US Federal Reserve (Fed) as being at the end of its [tightening] cycle and looking for rate cuts reasonably soon. How do you assess that expectation and what do you think the economic impact of the hikes has been up to now?

MR: It feels like it’s been about 12 months since some kind of recession has been the base case for most multi-asset investors and macro economists. I think it’s important to focus on how the different sectors of the economy respond to the change in interest rates we’ve already seen, and how important they are for the reaction function of the Fed and other central banks.

If we look at some of the major components of the economy, the housing market is the most rate sensitive in terms of proportion of GDP. Residential construction peaked two and a half years ago in the US, after which there was a marked slowdown in growth. But now that rates have stabilised and the market is expecting some rate cuts, we’ve seen housing market activity pick up.

The sequencing of the economy’s reaction to interest rate hikes is straightforward. The rate-sensitive areas of the economy move first and the labour market moves at the end. So the bull case for equity and multi asset investors has been predicated on the fact that despite one of the most aggressive tightening cycles we’ve ever seen, the labour market has been bulletproof.

The risk of having recession as a base case for 12 months is that people give up on that view now that the housing market has been improving so far this year in the US. We think that would be too bold a step to take, as we are now seeing some signs of cracking in the US labour.

We can certainly be optimistic about some elements of the economy, and retail sales beat expectations earlier this week. But some of the leading components of the labour market – hours worked, overtime hours, temporary employment – in some of the more cyclical sectors of the economy have certainly shown signs of weakening.

DM: These contradictory indications come on the back of an almost unprecedented combination of a global pandemic plus massive quantitative easing and fiscal stimulus, which makes it difficult to understand what’s going on. So how might this cycle be potentially different given that the environment is clearly different?

MR: We need to look for the structural imbalances, which are always different from one cycle to the next. There was huge speculative activity around the tech bubble bursting, then massive household indebtedness around the Global Financial Crisis (GFC).

This time it is clear that the imbalance is in the undersupply of labour after the pandemic, and the synchronised emergence of the pandemic itself. The three major areas of the global economy – the US, Europe and China –came out of Covid at a different pace and a different time, which really messed up supply chains. So companies had problems managing supply chains, perhaps overbuilding their inventories. They also had hiring difficulties coming out of Covid, often hoarding labour out of uncertainty.

The big structural change in this cycle has been inflation, which is partly the function of the supply chain problems and partly a function of other longer-run secular forces around demographics and globalization.

Those are the three key elements: The undersupply of labour, the decentralised economy and the structural change in the inflation backdrop. What’s very interesting about the current situation for many equity market investors is the strong profit performance we’ve seen, both coming out of Covid and even in recent quarters, where profits have beaten expectations.

We should analyse how much of that is pricing power and how much is volume. We’ve never had this problem in the past 20 or 30 years because we’ve had a low inflation environment, so we only had to think about the real side of the economy.

Now, with structurally higher inflation, it’s harder to disentangle things. But if we look at some of the sectors and company reporting season details, it’s clear that pricing power has been dominating. It’s much easier for a company to pass through a price hike if inflation is running at five, six, seven or 8% than at one or 2%. What we’re seeing now is that the inflation momentum is slowing slightly and the volume data has been a bit softer.

That is a concern because companies have been able to hoard labour because profitability has been so strong. Without that, they will probably play closer attention to their labour force, which could impact on that key pillar of the bull case and the economy could start to fall away.

DM: Your job ultimately is to pick the assets that you anticipate outperforming, even in this unprecedented environment. What’s your assessment of how markets are likely to move in the next few months?

MR: There are two additional wild cards we should touch on in the very near term – the debt ceiling debates in the US and the issue around regional banks. I expect that both of those can be resolved without them being systemic. That could provide some relief, and rally risk assets and lead to some near-term selling off in government bonds. Both of those will likely provide opportunities to go the other way. So through the second half of this year, we will be looking to add to defensive positions within fixed income and reduce some of the positions we have in equity markets.

DM: Mark, thank you very much for joining me.

MR: Thank you, Dan.

This is an edited version of a discussion on current market events and is not intended as investment advice or an offer of products or services by BNP Paribas Asset Management. Please keep in mind that the information and analysis in this presentation is only current as of the publication date.

Aviso legal

Algunos artículos pueden contener lenguaje técnico. Por esta razón, pueden no ser adecuados para lectores sin experiencia profesional en inversiones. Todos los pareceres expresados en el presente documento son los del autor en la fecha de su publicación, se basan en la información disponible y podrían sufrir cambios sin previo aviso. Los equipos individuales de gestión podrían tener opiniones diferentes y tomar otras decisiones de inversión para distintos clientes. El presente documento no constituye una recomendación de inversión. El valor de las inversiones y de las rentas que generan podría tanto bajar como subir, y es posible que el inversor no recupere su desembolso inicial. Las rentabilidades obtenidas en el pasado no son garantía de rentabilidades futuras. Es probable que la inversión en mercados emergentes o en sectores especializados o restringidos esté sujeta a una volatilidad superior a la media debido a un alto grado de concentración, a una mayor incertidumbre al haber menos información disponible, a una liquidez más baja o a una mayor sensibilidad a cambios en las condiciones sociales, políticas, económicas y de mercado. Algunos mercados emergentes ofrecen menos seguridad que la mayoría de los mercados desarrollados internacionales. Por este motivo, los servicios de ejecución de operaciones, liquidación y conservación en nombre de los fondos que invierten en emergentes podrían conllevar un mayor riesgo. Los activos privados son oportunidades de inversión no disponibles a través de mercados cotizados como por ejemplo las bolsas de valores de renta variable. Permiten a los inversores beneficiarse directamente a temas de inversión a largo plazo y pueden brindarles acceso a sectores especializados como infraestructura, inmobiliario, private equity y otros alternativos difícilmente disponibles a través de medios tradicionales. No obstante, los activos no cotizados requieren un examen minucioso, pues tienden a tener niveles elevados de inversión mínima y pueden ser complejos e ilíquidos.
Riesgo de inversión en cuestiones medioambientales, sociales y de buen gobierno (ESG): La falta de definiciones y etiquetas comunes o estandarizadas que integren los criterios ESG y de sostenibilidad en el ámbito de la Unión Europea puede dar lugar a diferentes enfoques por parte de las gestoras a la hora de establecer objetivos en materia de ESG. Además, puede dificultar la tarea de comparar estrategias que integren dichos criterios ESG y de sostenibilidad, ya que la selección y las ponderaciones utilizadas para elegir las inversiones pueden estar basadas en indicadores con el mismo nombre, pero con significados subyacentes diferentes. A la hora de evaluar un título determinado sobre la base de los criterios ESG y de sostenibilidad, la Gestora de Inversiones puede también recurrir a fuentes de datos ofrecidas por proveedores externos de análisis ESG. Dada la naturaleza dinámica de las cuestiones ESG, es posible que estas fuentes de datos estén incompletas, sean imprecisas o no estén disponibles. La aplicación de normas de conducta empresarial responsables al proceso de inversión puede llevar a la exclusión de los títulos emitidos por determinados emisores. Por lo tanto, la rentabilidad (del Subfondo) puede ser en ocasiones mejor o peor que la rentabilidad de los fondos comparables que no aplican dichas normas.

Artículos relacionados

Talking heads – Volatilidad en la tecnología disruptiva
Pamela HegartyDaniel Morris
2 Autores - Ideas de inversión
16/05/2022 · 2 Min
13:16 MIN
Talking heads – La inversión en la nube no es una moda pasajera
Daniel Morris
2 Autores - Ideas de inversión
11/07/2022 · 2 Min
Para acceder a la información de nuestros equipos en todo el mundo, visite:
BNP AM
Explora VIEWPOINT hoy