The sustainable investor for a changing world

Portfolio perspectives | Article - 3 Min

The low volatility anomaly – Still going strong after 50 years

Half a century ago, it became clear that investing in higher risk equities is not necessarily rewarded with higher returns. This low volatility anomaly goes against the traditional belief that there should be an extra reward for taking more risk. The anomaly persists to this day. There is now a range of investment strategies seeking to capture the benefits of the anomaly, including our own.  

It can be considered an anomaly that stock returns do not increase with volatility (more volatility being seen as reflecting investor concerns over, for example, upcoming results and the strength of the issuer’s balance sheet). Intuitively, you would expect high-volatility stocks to offer investors a higher compensation for that increased risk. However, empirical evidence has shown over and over again that this is not the case, in particular over the medium to long term.

The phenomenon was first reported by Robert Haugen and James Heins. In a December 1972 paper entitled “On the Evidence Supporting the Existence of Risk Premiums in the Capital Market”, they analysed the performance of US stocks between 1926 and 1969.

Too controversial at the time, the paper was not published until December 1975 in the Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis in a revised form and under a new title: “Risk and the Rate of Return on Financial Assets: Some Old Wine in New Bottles”.  

Low volatility has since been widely studied and debated in the financial industry. It has been extended to other asset classes. For example, in 2014, in “Low risk anomalies in global fixed income: evidence from major broad markets”, we showed that such an anomaly can also be found – to a varying extent – everywhere in fixed income markets.

Low volatility anomaly – the origins

Several possible explanations of the anomaly have been proposed over the last 50 years. They tend to be based on the observation that investors typically prefer higher-risk stocks for a number of reasons that are not taken into account in basic financial theory.

The first explanation was offered by Fischer Black, Michael C. Jensen and Myron Scholes in “The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Some Empirical Tests” published in “Studies in the Theory of Capital Markets” in 1972. They showed that constraining the amount of leverage investors can use creates a preference for higher-risk stocks. This should result in lower returns than otherwise expected for the same level of risk, i.e. in a low volatility anomaly.

The second explanation involves the notion that not all investors seek to maximise absolute returns and reduce volatility as it is required for returns to scale with risk.

Indeed, most professional fund managers are assessed on the excess returns and risk they create against market capitalisation benchmark indices. Moreover, the remuneration of fund managers is often asymmetrically linked to those excess returns, i.e. there is strong upside potential in the case of outperformance, but limited downside in the case of underperformance. This incentivises them to take risk and prefer higher-risk stocks.

Finally, behavioural theory challenges the notion that information is complete and rationally processed, as required for returns to scale with risk.

Indeed, the vast majority of investors, even professionals, is affected by the same cognitive biases that affect everyone else such as the biases relating to representativeness[1], overconfidence[2] or a preference for lotteries.[3] These biases have been associated with a preference for riskier stocks, even if there is no added reward for the extra risk.

Such misconceptions can lead to the low volatility anomaly.

Proprietary research

Our research has shown that the least volatile stocks in every equity sector have a higher Sharpe ratio than those of the riskier stocks in the same cohort. In other words, the low volatility anomaly was found to be omnipresent: It is not confined to sectors typically viewed as less volatile such as utilities, consumer staples or healthcare.

A decade after launching our global low volatility equity strategy[4], we revisited our research to ascertain if our initial analysis still held true. As we explain in “The low volatility anomaly in equity sectors – 10 years later!”, the answer is a resounding ‘yes’.

The results defy the notion that once an anomaly is discovered, it tends to be arbitraged away. In our view, the low volatility anomaly is alive and kicking.  

This is part 1 of a mini-series marking 50 years since the discovery of the low volatility anomaly. Parts 2 and 3 will cover evidence of the anomaly and implementing it in practice.

Further reading

A low volatility equity strategy that can resist rising rates and inflation

The low volatility anomaly in equity sectors revisited


[1] See  

[2] See  

[3] See  

[4] Parvest Equity World Low Volatility, launched in March 2011, has become BNP Paribas Sustainable Global Low Vol Equity effective September 2019. For illustrative purposes only. Past performance is no guarantee of future performance.


Please note that articles may contain technical language. For this reason, they may not be suitable for readers without professional investment experience. Any views expressed here are those of the author as of the date of publication, are based on available information, and are subject to change without notice. Individual portfolio management teams may hold different views and may take different investment decisions for different clients. This document does not constitute investment advice. The value of investments and the income they generate may go down as well as up and it is possible that investors will not recover their initial outlay. Past performance is no guarantee for future returns. Investing in emerging markets, or specialised or restricted sectors is likely to be subject to a higher-than-average volatility due to a high degree of concentration, greater uncertainty because less information is available, there is less liquidity or due to greater sensitivity to changes in market conditions (social, political and economic conditions). Some emerging markets offer less security than the majority of international developed markets. For this reason, services for portfolio transactions, liquidation and conservation on behalf of funds invested in emerging markets may carry greater risk.

Related insights

12:14 MIN
Market weekly – Lessons in factor investing from the covid-19 crisis (podcast)
11:06 MIN
Talking heads – Look for value in the value style

In the U.S., this material is for Institutional use only – not for public distribution. This material is provided for educational purposes only and is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy. References to specific securities, asset classes and financial markets are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be and should not be interpreted as recommendations. Reliance upon information in this material is at the sole risk and discretion of the reader. The material was prepared without regard to specific objectives, financial situation or needs of any investor.

These documents and video clips may also include information obtained from affiliated investment management companies within BNP Paribas Asset Management, the brand name of the BNP Paribas group’s asset management services. The documents and video clips are produced for informational purposes only and do not constitute: 1. an offer to buy nor a solicitation to sell, nor shall they form the basis of or be relied upon in connection with any contract or commitment whatsoever or 2. investment advice. Any opinions included in these documents and video clips constitute the judgment of the author/ presenter at the time specified and may be subject to change without notice.

This material may contain “forward-looking” information that is not purely historical in nature. Such information may include, among other things, projections, forecasts, and estimates of yields or returns. No representation is made that any performance presented will be achieved by any funds, or that every assumption made in achieving, calculating or presenting either the forward-looking information or any historical performance information herein has been considered or stated in preparing this material. Any changes to assumptions that may have been made in preparing this material could have a material impact on the investment returns that are presented herein. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of current or future results and should not be the sole factor of consideration when selecting a product or strategy.

The information and opinions contained in this material are derived from proprietary and nonproprietary sources deemed by BNP PARIBAS ASSET MANAGEMENT USA, Inc. to be reliable, are not necessarily all-inclusive and are not guaranteed as to accuracy.

The information provided here is neither tax nor legal advice. Investors should speak to their tax professional for specific information regarding their tax situation. Investment involves risk including possible loss of principal. International investing involves risks, including risks related to foreign currency, limited liquidity, less government regulation, and the possibility of substantial volatility due to adverse political, economic or other developments. These risks are often heightened for investments in emerging/developing markets or smaller capital markets.


BNP PARIBAS ASSET MANAGEMENT USA, Inc. is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. BNP PARIBAS ASSET MANAGEMENT USA, Inc. is a registered trademark of BNP Paribas or its subsidiaries in the United States and elsewhere. All other trademarks are those of their respective owners. © 2023 BNP PARIBAS ASSET MANAGEMENT USA, Inc., All rights reserved.

BNP PARIBAS ASSET MANAGEMENT is the global brand name of the BNP Paribas group’s asset management services. © 2023 BNP PARIBAS ASSET MANAGEMENT USA, Inc., All rights reserved.

BNP Paribas Asset Management seeks to integrate environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) factors into all of our portfolios as a means to mitigate certain short, medium and long-term financial risks, identify better long-term investments, and encourage more responsible corporate behavior. We will never subordinate our client’s interests to unrelated objectives. Certain issuers and industries are excluded from our actively managed portfolios based upon our view of their ESG performance and risk profile. As a result, we may pass up certain opportunities when these excluded issuers or industries are in favor. Due to significant gaps in disclosure regimes around the world, we may need to rely upon voluntary disclosures by issuers, which are often not audited. We therefore may not have consistent access to complete, accurate or comparable information about the ESG performance of our holdings. Please consult the applicable offering document for more information about the specific ESG strategy employed by each investment strategy since a given strategy may not have specific ESG guidelines, and investments are not limited to securities that are ESG compatible.

To access insights from our teams worldwide visit:
Explore VIEWPOINT today