- Overweight global equities: We modestly increased equity exposure given the strong earnings momentum, positive revisions, and more reasonable valuations – and we remain constructive on artificial intelligence infrastructure. While rising long-term rates remain a risk, softer US employment and inflation dynamics provide a counterbalance to hawkish central banks
- Focusing on attractive sectors in wake of momentum unwind: We rotated part of our gains in European banks into broader European equity exposure to capture improving macroeconomic momentum and a potential broadening of earnings leadership. We maintained our exposure to the Nasdaq and Korea
- Neutral EU duration, holding two-year US Treasuries: We remain cautious on long-dated government bonds as elevated fiscal deficits and rising term premia continue to pressure yields higher. We favour short-dated US Treasuries, where restrictive policy rates provide attractive income while limiting exposure to further steepening in long-end yield curves
Citadel’s acquisition of Situational Awareness’s artificial intelligence-focused portfolio in late July was one of the likely catalysts for the summer’s AI and momentum market correction.
In our view, this combined with the deleveraging of crowded positions in Korean memory and AI-related semiconductor stocks, helped remove excess leverage and reset investor positioning.
The subsequent recovery in AI leaders is more consistent with a technical washout, rather than a structural deterioration in the theme. Against this backdrop, we modestly increased equity risk, with a concentration in US technology and semiconductor firms and Korean memory companies.
A key question surrounding the AI investment cycle is whether rapidly improving model efficiency and falling inference costs will ultimately undermine the economics of the ecosystem.
Recent data suggests the opposite may be occurring. The cost of tokens – the price users pay across major AI models – as measured by Silicon Data’s AI pricing index, has fallen by roughly 40% since the end of June, yet average AI spending per employee continues to grow robustly.
This points to a highly elastic demand profile, where lower costs stimulate consumption enough to increase overall spending. Importantly, the cost of intelligence decline has been accompanied by resilient demand for the underlying compute infrastructure.
Graphics processing unit rental prices have rebounded from their June lows, while hyperscalers’ cloud revenues continue to grow strongly, suggesting additional compute capacity is being rapidly absorbed by end-users.
In other words, efficiency gains are not reducing demand for AI hardware and infrastructure, they appear to be expanding the range and intensity of AI applications.
AI demand’s resilience has increasingly shifted investor attention away from the demand side of the equation and toward the financing requirements needed to sustain the buildout.
As hyperscalers accelerate investment in datacentres and compute capacity, bond investors have become more focused on the scale and funding of future capital expenditures. Investment grade tech spreads have widened, with hyperscaler credit spreads now back to levels last seen in 2022.
Watching long-term interest rates
Recent technology bond deals have seen weaker demand and underperformed in secondary trading, while market participants increasingly expect a significant increase in debt issuance to finance AI-related investments. Against this backdrop, developments in long-term interest rates are becoming increasingly important.
Treasury yields moved higher ahead of Jackson Hole, reflecting growing uncertainty around the interaction between the Federal Reserve’s policy rate and longer-term market rates. While some have interpreted the steepening yield curve as a sign of diminishing confidence in the Fed, the evidence points instead to a rise in real yields rather than inflation expectations.
US inflation showed no meaningful signs of reacceleration, with July core CPI increasing just 0.2% month-on-month, reinforcing the view that policy rates are likely to remain unchanged in September.
At the same time, the labour market has shown increasing signs of cooling and broader activity indicators point to a gradual loss of economic momentum. Consistent with this assessment, July’s Federal Open Market Committee policy meeting minutes suggested members continue to view the current policy as sufficiently restrictive provided inflation keeps moderating.
Rising yields
Importantly, bond investors do not appear concerned about an inflation resurgence. Market-based inflation expectations remain relatively stable. Instead, investors appear to be demanding a higher term premium to compensate for increased uncertainty surrounding fiscal policy.
While US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has effectively tasked the Treasury to step into the market to control the yield curve, investors appear unconvinced that technical interventions in bond markets can substitute for meaningful action on spending and deficits.
Until greater fiscal discipline emerges, upward pressure on Treasury yields may persist, with implications for global asset allocation and valuation multiples across risk assets. Recent moves in the US dollar and gold market reinforce this narrative.
To be fair, the upward drift in long-dated sovereign yields should not be viewed exclusively through a US lens. Across developed markets, term premia are rising as investors reassess the implications of structurally higher fiscal deficits and sustained bond issuance.
The normalisation of Japanese monetary policy adds a further layer of pressure. As domestic yields move higher and the Bank of Japan continues its balance-sheet reduction, Japanese investors face less incentive to seek duration abroad.
For investors, the key implication is that financial conditions may continue to tighten through higher long-term yields, even without further Federal Reserve rate hikes. Elevated real rates remain a headwind for equity valuations, particularly in longer-duration segments of the market, while a sustained decline in Treasury yields will likely require greater confidence in the trajectory of US fiscal policy.
Against this backdrop, we maintain a preference for high-quality fixed income and favour short to intermediate-duration exposures, at least until long-end yields appear to have found a more stable equilibrium.
