The sustainable investor for a changing world

Poland sewage treatment plant
Portfolio perspectives | Article - 4 Min

Infrastructure Debt – A solution for the current environment?

Particularly during the height of the Covid-19 pandemic and ensuing lockdowns, infrastructure debt proved to be resilient as an asset class – appealing to a broad section of institutional investors in form of pension funds, insurance companies and sovereign wealth funds. Despite lockdowns shutting down businesses and many aspects of society, specific sectors such as renewables, telecommunications and utilities continued to perform through the provision of essential services.

However, while infrastructure debt demonstrated to be a safe haven through its ability to weather the storm during the pandemic, new challenges have since arisen as we move into the new post-pandemic normal. A key concern for investors is now rising inflation, as well as rising interest rates. Further fuelling uncertainties for investors, are concerns about an impending economic recession across Europe and globally. Hence the question for investors, is European infrastructure debt an investment solution fit for the current environment?

A broad and diverse investment universe

The simple answer to the question above is yes, although investors need to consider that the infrastructure debt market offers a range of solutions with differing sector exposures and risk return profiles. The market is broad, diverse and remains buoyant, with approximately €310 billion in deal value in 2021, of which 70% is financed with debt1.  

Overall, the infrastructure debt market remains resilient and well positioned to navigate through a potential recession. For the same reasons that helped navigate through the pandemic, many infrastructure projects provide essential services that are mostly recession-proof. Examples include projects in the renewables and power sectors, where people require energy irrespective of market conditions. Similarly, the telecommunications sector provides essential services including data and vital communication networks. Utilities is another sector where infrastructure projects provide essential services, an example being water and sewerage facilities.

Another resilient sector that is well placed to perform irrespective of a recession is transportation, with projects such as rail and roads essential for the movement of people and goods. While this sector was adversely impacted by the 2020 lockdowns, we have seen a recovery of deal flow.

For investors seeking long-term stable income, infrastructure debt remains a resilient investment solution. However, what about investors seeking greater yields or premiums?

Case for junior infrastructure debt

2022 has been a year of soaring inflation, with inflation rates for the UK and the Euro Zone at 9.1% and 8.9% respectively.2  It has been a challenging environment for credit markets, with corporate bond yields also rising significantly – Euro BB corporate bond yields rose from 2.36% in February to above 5.50% in July 20223 .  This situation has created a potential dilemma for some infrastructure debt investors, particularly ones seeking a relative yield premium (to equivalently rated corporate bonds), which has largely diminished.

Junior infrastructure debt is a potential solution for these investors seeking higher yields, offering higher equity-like returns while maintaining debt-like protections. It is an investment solution befitting the current market environment and outlook, given it offers higher returns without overly extending on risk. For example, in Europe we have been witnessing junior infrastructure debt transactions offering over 6.5% return, which is relatively attractive when factoring in the additional covenants and collateral when compared to an equivalently rated European High Yield Bond, which is unsecured and with little (or no) covenant protection.

Within the broader infrastructure debt market, the junior debt segment is becoming more prominent. An increasingly competitive infrastructure equity market has pushed project sponsors to become more sophisticated in their financing structures to reduce debt servicing costs. This in turn has led to more tranching to target investors with different risk return objectives.

Linked to this, infrastructure equity reserves have been growing significantly, pushing up the underlying equity prices. Equity holders are utilising junior infrastructure debt as a mechanism to increase leverage and increase their internal rate of return. This segment of the market is now well established in Europe and growing at a steady rate.

Notably, the junior debt segment of the market is still relatively uncrowded, as regulations (i.e. Solvency II Capital Charges) have so far enticed investors to focus on the senior (or investment-grade) segment of the market. From a pricing perspective, these regulatory constraints mean that junior infrastructure debt is not suffering the same competitive pricing tension as observed in the investment-grade space where banks and insurance companies compete heavily.

Due to the increase in supply of junior debt and less investor demand, the junior debt segment of the market offers a highly attractive risk return profile, including for many insurers after adjusting for Solvency II capital charges as well as other investors seeking attractive yields.

Challenges that lie ahead

Whether it is an investor seeking higher risk adjusted returns, or one seeking a safe haven ahead of potentially challenging market conditions, European infrastructure debt can offer an attractive solution. As already proven during the height of the Covid-19 pandemic, the asset class is steady and resilient, and backed by projects providing essential services. More recently, we have seen an expanding segment of the market, the junior debt segment, offering higher returns at a subordinated level while retaining debt-like protections. Whatever the investment preference, European infrastructure debt represents a compelling solution to weather oncoming storms.

1 Infranews, Jan 2022

2 ONS, Bloomberg, August 2022

3 Bloomberg, BaML Euro High Yield BB Index, August 2022


Private assets are investment opportunities that are unavailable through public markets such as stock exchanges. They enable investors to directly profit from long-term investment themes and can provide access to specialist sectors or industries, such as infrastructure, real estate, private equity and other alternatives that are difficult to access through traditional means. Private assets do, however, require careful consideration, as they tend to have high minimum investment levels and may be complex and illiquid.
Please note that articles may contain technical language. For this reason, they may not be suitable for readers without professional investment experience. Any views expressed here are those of the author as of the date of publication, are based on available information, and are subject to change without notice. Individual portfolio management teams may hold different views and may take different investment decisions for different clients. This document does not constitute investment advice. The value of investments and the income they generate may go down as well as up and it is possible that investors will not recover their initial outlay. Past performance is no guarantee for future returns. Investing in emerging markets, or specialised or restricted sectors is likely to be subject to a higher-than-average volatility due to a high degree of concentration, greater uncertainty because less information is available, there is less liquidity or due to greater sensitivity to changes in market conditions (social, political and economic conditions). Some emerging markets offer less security than the majority of international developed markets. For this reason, services for portfolio transactions, liquidation and conservation on behalf of funds invested in emerging markets may carry greater risk.
Environmental, social and governance (ESG) investment risk: The lack of common or harmonised definitions and labels integrating ESG and sustainability criteria at EU level may result in different approaches by managers when setting ESG objectives. This also means that it may be difficult to compare strategies integrating ESG and sustainability criteria to the extent that the selection and weightings applied to select investments may be based on metrics that may share the same name but have different underlying meanings. In evaluating a security based on the ESG and sustainability criteria, the Investment Manager may also use data sources provided by external ESG research providers. Given the evolving nature of ESG, these data sources may for the time being be incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable. Applying responsible business conduct standards in the investment process may lead to the exclusion of securities of certain issuers. Consequently, (the Sub-Fund's) performance may at times be better or worse than the performance of relatable funds that do not apply such standards.

Related insights

Embedding ESG into private debt can reduce risk and add opportunity
13:28 MIN
Market weekly - What to expect after the Great Pandemic of 2020 (podcast)
Daniel Morris
2 Authors - Portfolio perspectives
23/06/2020 · 2 Min
To access insights from our teams worldwide visit:
Explore VIEWPOINT today