The sustainable investor for a changing world

Italy road in Passo Giau Dolomites
Portfolio perspectives | White paper - 5 Min

Asset Allocation Monthly - A narrower distribution, skewed to the downside

Maya BhandariDaniel Morris
2 Authors - Portfolio perspectives
07/06/2023 · 5 Min

We judge the risks to growth as being skewed increasingly to the downside, particularly in the US. We see roughly even odds of recession or stagflation in the US in the next 12 months. We lowered US equities to underweight, reducing equities overall in tandem, neutralised our duration caution and started to build long positions in long US inflation-linked bonds.

US cycle ‘long in the tooth’

As we approach mid-year, macroeconomic data has continued to be mixed. Looking at Nowcast data and consensus forecasts across the main economies, momentum appears to be rolling over in most places. For example, the US Federal Reserve of Atlanta’s GDPNow model estimate for real US GDP growth in the second quarter of 2023 was a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1.9% on 26 May, down from 2.9 % on 17 May.

The US housing market may have troughed after an eight-quarter drag on GDP. Better housing data has (so far) failed to close the gap with weak and weakening business surveys (at 5%, residential investment matters much less for GDP compared to around 12% for business investment.

Overall, we see sufficient data, particularly leading indicators (including in the labour market), that is consistent with recession unfolding. Business and consumer sentiment are weak and the regional US banking debacle has added to already contractionary lending standards. Companies are following a more standard ‘playbook’, where capital expenditure is cut first, then hiring is paused, before employees are laid offs as recession unfolds. We see the US cycle as particularly ‘long in the tooth’.

One notable implication is that the tail risk of renewed overheating that markets were pricing in for the US economy just a couple of months ago now appears firmly off the table. We see roughly even odds of US recession or stagflation in the next 12 months.

In Europe, recent data showed the German economy contracted by 0.3 % in the three months to March after a downward revision from the initial estimate of zero growth. This second consecutive quarterly decline meets the technical definition of recession.

Nonetheless, second-round effects are becoming ‘baked in’ to negotiated wages, fiscal policy is easy and monetary tightening is further behind than in the US. This supports our short European duration position put on after-market dislocations around Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank in the US.

Such an environment also supports our short towards European equities, where margin pressures are rising and analyst earnings expectations appear lofty relative to the economic outlook. Investor sentiment has remained negative towards China, which explains much (though not all) of the underperformance of emerging market equities so far this year (see Exhibit 1).

However, we see Asia recovering even as the US and Europe move towards recession. Chinese data have disappointed recently, but activity is still running at a 6.5-7% growth rate and we believe the scope to ease policy remains intact, unlike in developed countries. With real rates high for many emerging markets, and valuations and earnings expectations depressed, we see potential for discount rates to fall and earnings growth to improve. This supports the positive position we have on emerging market equities (two-thirds emerging markets, one-third MSCI China) relative to European and US stocks.

Unrealistic earnings expectations  

In our view, earnings expectations for S&P500 companies do not reflect this environment with flat earnings-per-share (EPS) growth expected in 2023 (+5% excluding energy), followed by double-digit rises (11-12%) in 2024 and 2025. We would expect overall corporate earnings to fall instead as the recession unfolds – by double digits (12-15%) (and perhaps more given the boost from higher nominal growth, or the ‘money illusion’). Waning economic momentum supports the view that the federal funds rate is at or around its peak for this cycle, but it also poses a challenge to corporate America. Margin expansion may be ending as companies find it increasingly difficult to pass on price increases – the real challenge of the ‘money illusion’ that is created by high inflation in combination with weakening real growth (see Exhibit 2).

US equities increasingly vulnerable

The robust performance of US equities this year has relied almost entirely on the technology sector, with more than half of the S&P 500 index return due to Apple, Microsoft and NVIDIA. When we exclude technology, the market is roughly flat.

We are concerned over the negative signals coming from individual sectors. Consumer discretionary stocks, for example, are now underperforming consumer staples on average, suggesting the US consumer is starting to run out of steam.

Liquidity conditions are challenging for US stocks. The US banking sector remains exposed to the risk of a deposit flight with already tightening liquidity conditions amplified by the removal of liquidity via the Fed’s quantitative tightening.

Valuations are stretched

While forward price-earnings ratios for the S&P 500 index fell in 2022, they have increased this year: relative to global stocks (as represented by the MSCI All Country World Index) the forward premium is 16%, which is near the highs seen since the Global Financial Crisis. Much of this premium is concentrated in the technology sector, though the index is no less vulnerable for it. The 2022 premium may have been justified by better returns-on-equity, but both trailing and forward-looking measures are rolling over now (see Exhibit 3). According to our longer-term valuation frameworks that incorporate trend earnings valuations, the US market may be ‘mispriced’ by 30-35%.

Despite this context, investor positioning appears to be less underweight risk assets than some sell-side surveys suggest, with modest and falling interest in having an underweight in stocks. Real money investors appear to be overweight equities at levels corresponding to around the average levels of the last decade or so.

Given all these factors, we downgraded US equities to ‘dislike’ (see table below) and our active portfolios are starting to be positioned more cautiously. This extends the direction of travel from January when we were modestly constructive before turning more neutral in February/March and then initiating a modest underweight in late April.

Positioning for the end of the US hikes

We have raised our allocation to government bonds from underweight to neutral, expressed by a tactical short towards EU sovereigns on the one hand along with an overweight position in long-dated US linkers. Supporting the long Treasury Inflation Protected Securities position is the asymmetric and attractive risk reward as the Fed approaches the end of its hiking cycle, though this remains highly conditional on the course of inflation. Yields on 20-year TIPS are near the highs of the decade and at levels associated most recently with renewed economic overheating. We believe, however, that the recent turmoil in the US banking sector means that overheating is no longer plausible and that there is consequently a clear valuation disconnect.

Asset class views


Please note that articles may contain technical language. For this reason, they may not be suitable for readers without professional investment experience. Any views expressed here are those of the author as of the date of publication, are based on available information, and are subject to change without notice. Individual portfolio management teams may hold different views and may take different investment decisions for different clients. This document does not constitute investment advice. The value of investments and the income they generate may go down as well as up and it is possible that investors will not recover their initial outlay. Past performance is no guarantee for future returns. Investing in emerging markets, or specialised or restricted sectors is likely to be subject to a higher-than-average volatility due to a high degree of concentration, greater uncertainty because less information is available, there is less liquidity or due to greater sensitivity to changes in market conditions (social, political and economic conditions). Some emerging markets offer less security than the majority of international developed markets. For this reason, services for portfolio transactions, liquidation and conservation on behalf of funds invested in emerging markets may carry greater risk.
Environmental, social and governance (ESG) investment risk: The lack of common or harmonised definitions and labels integrating ESG and sustainability criteria at EU level may result in different approaches by managers when setting ESG objectives. This also means that it may be difficult to compare strategies integrating ESG and sustainability criteria to the extent that the selection and weightings applied to select investments may be based on metrics that may share the same name but have different underlying meanings. In evaluating a security based on the ESG and sustainability criteria, the Investment Manager may also use data sources provided by external ESG research providers. Given the evolving nature of ESG, these data sources may for the time being be incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable. Applying responsible business conduct standards in the investment process may lead to the exclusion of securities of certain issuers. Consequently, (the Sub-Fund's) performance may at times be better or worse than the performance of relatable funds that do not apply such standards.

Related insights

Fixed income outlook: the hunt for inflation
14:07 MIN
Market weekly – Quality is now key
To access insights from our teams worldwide visit:
Explore VIEWPOINT today